Showing posts with label Images. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Images. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Press Release

Assessment of Project Progress
Math, Science & Technology Application

Contact: Brian Rees FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Period 5/6 19 MARCH 2008

Systems Engineering II: Adjustable Oarlock

Sandy Hook, NJ (3/19/08)
Brian Rees, a senior at the Marine Academy of Science & Technology, taking Systems Engineering II, and during the course of the school year, has designed and created a fully functional adjustable oarlock, designed to provide an alternative to the obsolete preexisting technology, which is currently in use worldwide. This adjustable oarlock is designed to fit into a test vessel, also provided by Mr. Rees, and will eventually be tested under real-life conditions.




Figure 1- Collection of Three Standard Oarlocks

Oars have been used to propel boats for thousands of years, from before the era of recorded history. While the technology used in production and design of these vessels has progressed through the years, the system used to lock oars into place has not changed. Brian Rees has attempted to solve this fundamental issue with the creation of a new product, which allows for one to adjust the oars in ways previously impossible.
In figure one, three separate oarlock designs are shown. These designs have existed for decades, with virtually no changes involved. In modern (and ancient) oarlock design, oars are placed inside of small metal hoops, and are securely fastened to the boat through the vessel’s oarlock fitting. These fittings cannot move, and the oars can be hard to manage for smaller rowers, or cumbersome to row for larger people. Personal preference could demand the oars be placed further forward or backward, but even modern oarlocks make no concessions for adjustments. This is due, in part, to the wide range of owners and operators who take advantage of the versatility and utility of rowboats, requiring boat designers to craft vessels which are comfortable for the greatest range of people: Those outside this range will have a reduced level of comfort, and as such, the accessibility of the design will be significantly reduced.
Through careful research, Mr. Rees attempted to draft a model that could solve the problem at hand. Combining personal experience with various published sources, Brian identified several areas critical to the success of any potential design. These areas included: Use of marine grade materials, ability to be removed at any time without tools, and a semi-modular design. Based on these, and additional criteria, Brian created three separate solutions to the problem, each with their own benefits and drawbacks.
The three solutions followed the same general guidelines, but each solved the problem in a different way. The first solution involved the use of metal and wood to achieve the desired goal. Wood is easy to work with when compared with other mediums, such as steel or fiberglass. However, wood is somewhat flimsy when compared to metals, so the design incorporated metal into the wood dominant design, reinforcing the product at several key points. The second design presented is more conventional, using steel flats in its construction. This design is more difficult to construct then a wooden hybrid, requiring the use of solder, and possibly light welding. This more complex design is a lighter, more durable mechanism, which is more resistant to both the actions of the marine environment and repeated, heavy use. The final design involves taking existing technology, namely, a sailboat rail track, and adapting it into use for the adjustable oarlock. Since the hardware is already available, the design process will concentrate on modifying the T-Tracks, instead of designed an entirely new product.
Having three possible solutions in mind, it was time to narrow the field to one model to be put into production. Based on the pros and cons of each individual idea, the final solution was chosen as an all steel design, with a mockup constructed (see figure two) to highlight the design aspects of the product. Construction would begin soon afterwards, with steel flats ordered to the design specifications required. Construction could not continue, however, without assistance from an experienced mentor. Mr. Rees’s mentor has had years of experience working around boats of all shapes and sizes, and has owned the largest marina in Fair Haven, NJ for several years. This mentor assisted Mr. Rees throughout the project, giving helpful advice and input throughout the entire planning phase. When construction began, this mentor assisted Brian by giving general advice as to how to properly manufacture the product in preparation for use in the marine environment. This project could not have been successfully completed without the help of this mentor, and many of the design elements are drawn straight from his suggestions.



Figure 2- Finished Mockup, topside

With construction nearly complete, Mr. Rees has examined the mathematic, scientific, and technical features of this project, and how the completion of the adjustable oarlock would best exemplify these aspects. Rudimentary mathematical skills were required to place holes in the steel flats, taking into account balance and symmetry. The scientific aspect most pertinent to completion of this project was that of ergonomics, previously taught earlier in the Systems II curriculum. The oarlock was designed from the outset to provide a comfortable, accessible product, with the end user’s experience being of chief concern. The technical aspects of the project were of the utmost importance, involving the use of the drill press, hacksaw, and eventually, welding tools. The skills taught in the Systems Engineering course played an important role in the manufacture of Brian’s project. The process is illustrated below, in Figure 3, where the steel flat has been cut in half carefully, with the use of a hacksaw.



Figure 3- Steel Flat Prepared for Further Construction

At this stage, Brian’s project is nearing completion, with only minor welding required to complete the end product. Mr. Rees plans to test the final model using a test vessel he will provide, so the prototype can undergo the stresses it would experience in the course of normal use. This period of testing will reveal any flaws in the final design, which will be corrected as needed. This project is the result of over a year’s worth of work, and has only a few small steps before reaching completion. Mr. Rees is excited and motivated to finish his endeavors, and looks forward to the successful test of the finished adjustable oarlock.


For more details about the Adjustable Oarlock, contact Brian Rees at brianjrees@gmail.com, or visit the Marine Academy of Science and Technology at http://mast.mcvsd.org

Friday, January 18, 2008

Plan of Procedures

Adjustable Oarlock Design Process

Mounting oarlocks in different spots on a vessel requires a sturdy mounting block, capable of working with the stresses that occur from normal operation. Steel pieces offer the greatest strength for the lowest cost, making it the ideal choice for use in this project. Steel construction will be used throughout, from the mounting block, to the bolts and washers used to secure the assembly to the vessel hull. Knowledge of metalworking, specifically, welding, is required for the project’s success. Several holes must be tapped through solid steel, requiring careful attention to detail by the builder. There are two oarlock blocks required for the project, with both sides undergoing construction simultaneously. If both sides are built at the same time, it will be easier to apply similar techniques to both units instead of finishing one before beginning another.



Plan of Procedures:

A. Material Processing Steps:
1. Receive uncut steel flats in 40” size
2. Measure & cut 40”x 3” x ¼” steel flat into two 20” sections
3. Measure & cut 40” x 1.5” x ¼” steel flats into four 20” sections
4. Measure & cut 1” diameter hole into 3” steel flat
i. Measure 2” from end of flat to center of hole
ii. Measure 2” from center of hole, cut second hole
iii. Repeat cuts: four holes from side
5. Measure and cut access hole for stainless steel bolt
i. Measure 10 inches from center
ii. Cut hole wide enough for SS Bolt
6. Measure and cut 1” diameter hole for remainder of flat
i. Measure 2” from center of SS Bolt hole
ii. Cut 1” diameter hole in flat
iii. Repeat cuts: four holes from center
7. Repeat steps 4-6 for second 3” steel flat
B. Assembly Procedures
1. Clamp 1.5” steel flat at 0.5” from outside of 3” steel flat
2. Weld 1.5” steel flat into place onto 3” steel flat
3. Clamp 1.5” steel flat at 1.5” from outside of 3” steel flat, opposite of first 1.5” flat
4. Weld second 1.5” steel flat into place onto 3” steel flat
5. Repeat steps 1-4 for second steel flat
6. Mount washer and bolt assembly through bolt hole on steel flat
7. Mount completed oarlock assembly to vessel through existing oarlock hole
8. Secure device to boat with attachment of steel nut to stainless steel bolt
C. Finishing Steps
1. Mount desired oarlocks through holes in steel flat
2. Secure oarlocks to steel flat using existing cotter pin system
3. (if present on chosen oarlock)









Friday, December 14, 2007

3D Model

3D Model

Friday, December 7, 2007

Exploded, Isometric, Orthographic Views


Orthographic View


Exploded View


Isometric View

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Model Pictures

Model

The model of the final solution was constructed in the course of a week, with perhaps one hour of total build time. The model was constructed using simple and cheap materials, utilizing balsa wood and hot glue avalibile to all students in Systems class. After the frame was constructed, I cut up a length of PVC into small sections, which were added to the model with more hot glue. I completed the model by adding a metal bolt and spray painting the entire assembly a metallic, chrome style spray paint. The results of the construction are as follows:


Front View of Completed Model

Bottom View of Model

Closeup View of Bolt Assembly

Closeup View of Bolt Top

Side View of Completed Model

Selection/Rejection Report

Selection / Rejection Report

Wood & Metal Hybrid
The use of hybrid materials in the design for an adjustable oarlock has several practical applications. Wood is an easy material to work with, able to be transformed in order to suit the individual needs of the designer. Wood can also be obtained at relatively low cost, and variety of woods for purchase means that a suitable type can be chosen for the exact specifications of the product. The use of metal in the design adds strength to the critical points of the system, preventing heavy wear and extending the life of the oarlock mount. At each mounting point, the metal reinforcements will cut down on friction wear that is unavoidable in the design of oarlocks. The metal used will prolong the structural integrity of the design, letting the design stand up to heavy use over a long period of time. The hybrid design is inherently not as strong as a full metal construction, but is adequate for most applications, for a certain period of time. When one designs for long-term use, one must take into account the wear and tear that the product will undergo for its entire life. This is where wooden construction fails to deliver, where the flaws of wood are exposed. Hairline cracks can develop over time, and with these cracks come the promise of larger splits in the wood, leading to catastrophic failure across the entire product. One must also consider how wood must be protected from the elements. Water, trapped in the grain of wood, can swell and contract at a rapid rate, which, over the course of a few months, can render the material unusable. To prevent this problem, varnish or water sealant can be used, but this additional cost may be prohibitive on large scale production. The hybrid design brings several positive aspects along with it, but the consequences of using wood as a material outweigh the possible benefits.



Metal Construction
Using metal as the singular element of construction makes a great deal of sense, as metal is renowned for its durability and integrity. Although metalworking requires specialized tools, the benefits of using metal are immediately apparent. Friction wear becomes almost a non-issue, as one would assume the wooden oars to break down at a faster rate then the metal mounting bracket. With the rate of wear and tear reduced to a bare minimum, the primary focus becomes ergonomics, with a concentration on how easily the product can be used, when compared to a standard oarlock. When compared to a product that uses wood as its main means of construction, a metal structure requires less material for the same amount of strength, meaning a smaller overall design, more portability, and less weight. All of these characteristics make the product more attractive the potential customers, as does the sleek, streamlined design that metal can provide. The physical strength of this design, combined with aesthetically pleasing elements, mark this construction as one that deserves further development as a potential solution for the problems presented in this project.



T-Track Design
The use of existing technology make this solution unique in the designs proposed for this project, and this retrofitting of existing technology may provide one of the stronger designs, if it is at all possible. Sailboats use metal tracked rails to make adjustments on positions of line, and the use of these adjustable elements may prove a solution for the adjustable oarlock design. The only developmental problem that could occur in this conversion process is the design of a tracked metal instrument that would conform to the specifications outlined in the design of the product, while still functioning within the confines of the original sailboat T-track product. The rails on a standard sailboat track are nearly universal, but it is doubtful as to whether or not the product will hold up to a type of stress quite different from the track’s normal operation. This may be the limiting factor when considering further development of this type of design. If the product cannot withstand the stresses of rowing, it is not viable for selection. This design will cost far more than the other two solutions, as sailboat T-tracks are more expensive than a simple block of wood or length of angle iron. The designer is also limited to using the original dimensions of a pre-existing product, which may serve to hinder the creative process of the designer. By working with a clean sheet of metal or blank piece of wood, the designer has ultimate control over what goes into the product, instead of relying upon prefabricated designs.



Selection: Metal Construction
The metal construction’s benefits outweigh it’s consequences in several key areas. It is durable, cheap and relatively easy to work with, all the qualities one could desire in design of a product. Metal, once protected via electroplating, can withstand all kinds of environmental effects, including the rigors of salt water spray and other parts of the marine world which tend to accelerate wear. Metal is far stronger than a wooden solution, able to tolerate far more stress than the hybrid wooden/metal design. The metal design requires only minimal care to function correctly for a long period of time, contrasting the continuing upkeep that a wooden design would need to have in order to remain functional. The metal design also has several benefits which set it apart from the sailboat T-track design, as it is a simplistic design with fewer moving parts, always beneficial in the design of mechanical products. With fewer moving parts, there are fewer chances for failures in key structural parts, which help prolong the life of a product. The metal piece used will function as blank slate, letting the designer choose what he feels is most important for the ongoing construction of the adjustable oarlock.





Model Contructed of Metal Solution

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Monday, September 24, 2007

Appendices & Images

Oarlock Sketches*







Fig 4- Wood thole Oarlock Fig 5- Wood Pin Oarlock







Fig 6- Standard Oarlock Fig 7- Round Oarlock







Fig 8- North River Oarlock Fig 9- "Ram" Style Oarlock






*Sketches credited in Works Cited










Vessel Restoration






Fig 10- Vessel in Original Condition Fig 11- Results of Powerwashing








Fig 12- Fiberglass Repair Fig 13- Oarlock Repair






Fig 14- Oarlock Hole Repair Fig 15- Ideal Oarlock




Design Inspiration*



Fig 16- Frog Hook Fig 17- Sailboat T-Track

*Images credited in works cited